Archive for the ‘Debt Settlement’ Category

FTC Bans Upfront Fees by Debt Negotiators

Friday, July 30th, 2010

The FTC enacted a new rule, effective October 27, 2010, that will ban debt negotiators from collecting an advance fee before the debt has been negotiated.

This is a serious problem, as I have commented before on this blog. It has been said that the business of most debt negotiation companies is akin to a Ponzi scheme, because it essentially requires failure of the debt negotiation plan for the debt negotiation company to be most profitable. Most of these companies require payment of almost all of the fee upfront. So, for example, the total debt might be $40,000, monthly payment for 36 months might be $500, and the debt negotiation fee might be $4,500. But almost all of that fee would be taken in the first 9 months and then the debt negotiation would start. By that time, at least one of the creditors will have sued and the plan will fall apart. Most of the time the debtor will end up filing bankruptcy, having obtained no real benefit from the debt negotiation plan.

In addition, the rule will provide how much of the fee can be collected for each debt that is settled:

To ensure that debt relief providers do not front-load their fees if a
consumer has enrolled multiple debts in one debt relief program, the
Final Rule specifies how debt relief providers can collect their fee
for each settled debt. First, the provider’s fee for a single debt must
be in proportion to the total fee that would be charged if all of the
debts had been settled. Alternatively, if the provider bases its fee on
the percentage of what the consumer saves as result of using its
services, the percentage charged must be the same for each of the
consumer’s debts.

I do not think that the current business model used by most of the debt negotiation companies out there will work with these rules. So, we will either see a lot of companies get out of the business or they will be using a different business model, one that actually serves the clients. That being said, I would not be surprised to see a lot of companies try to operate while ignoring this rule.

Debt Negotiators Coming Under Increasing (and Deserved) Heat

Monday, June 21st, 2010

We have all heard the nauseating commercials: “If you owe $10,000 or more on credit cards, you may be eligible for a special program that will allow you to settle your debt for a fraction of what you owe! For more information on settling your debt in a government bailout era, call now!”

What they don’t tell you is that they have an incredibly low success rate or the reasons for their incredibly low success rate. Here are a few:

1. They take almost all of their (unconscionably large) fee upfront. Usually, it works like this. They set you up on  a payment plan paying say, $1,000 a month (which is usually about 4 times what you could afford). They take the first 4-5 months as their initial fee. Then, they take a percentage of what comes in after that to pay out to creditors.

2. They don’t do anything until you are at least 180 days past due. At that point, creditors have either turned it over to the collection wing, turned it over to the litigation wing, or sold the debt for pennies on the dollar. Only in the latter case will a reasonable settlement be reached and usually, some creditors do one thing and others do something else. In almost every case, at least one creditor sues and tries to garnish wages or a bank account. And, the calls that debtors receive are voluminous.

3. They don’t tell you that it is entirely voluntary on the part of the creditor and if one creditor refuses to play ball, the whole thing will go up in smoke because you will get your wages or bank account garnished by that one creditor, which will make it impossible for you to make the monthly payments.

This is a really good article in the New York Times addressing a lot of these debt negotiator problems. It is pretty clear that debt negotiators have a very low success rate:

In the case of two debt settlement companies sued last year by New York
State, the attorney general alleged that no more than 1 percent of
customers gained the services promised by marketers. A Colorado
investigation came to a similar conclusion.

The industry’s own figures show that clients typically fail to secure
relief. In a survey of its members, the Association of Settlement
Companies found that three years after enrolling, only 34 percent of
customers had either completed programs or were still saving for
settlements.

“The industry is designed almost as a Ponzi scheme,”
said Scott Johnson, chief executive of US Debt Resolve, a debt
settlement company based in Dallas, which he portrays as a rare island
of integrity in a sea of shady competitors. “Consumers come into these
programs and pay thousands of dollars and then nothing happens. What
they constantly have to have is more consumers coming into the program
to come up with the money for more marketing.”

The following account is typical of what I see frequently with people who go to a debt negotiator before coming to see me:

Ms. Robertson made nine payments, according to Financial Freedom. Late
last year, a sheriff’s deputy arrived at her door with court papers:
One of her creditors, Capital One, had filed suit to collect roughly $5,000.

Panicked, she called Financial Freedom to seek guidance. “They said,
‘Oh, we don’t have any control over that, and you don’t have enough
money in your account for us to settle with them,’ ” she recalled.

Her account held only $1,470, the representative explained, though she
had by then deposited more than $3,700. Financial Freedom had taken the
rest for its administrative fees, the company confirmed. 

Bankruptcy may not be right for everyone, but debt negotiation (at least through most of the firms out there) is rarely right for anyone.

Mr. Fear Quoted in Article on Debt Consolidation/Negotiation

Monday, April 12th, 2010

I was recently quoted in an article in The Business Journal entitled: Local attorney cautions against debt consolidation. The reporter in this story was trying to do a story setting out the pros and cons of debt negotiation/consolidation. I highly encouraged him to try to contact a debt negotation company for an interview. I even gave him quite a few questions to ask. Apparently, he was unable to get anyone to give him an interview, because they are not quoted here.